Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Marxism is Back
The "vetting" process during the 2007/2008 primary normally would have exposed a candidate's background and political philosophy, but the mainstream media totally ignored Obama's radical Marxist/Socialist associations which would have exposed his political agenda and he would have been summarily rejected. But no, instead he was able to mesmerise the media and throngs of people into drinking the "kool-aid" of his message of "change" and "hope". They didn't seem to care what "change" or "hope" he was talking about. This was the perfect stage to allow the possibility of tyranny to reign once they legitimized his election.
The Associated Press recently assigned 11 reporters to fact check Sarah Palin's new book even before it's official release, and I can't think of any fact checking done by them on Barack Obama's two books that been in print for quite sometime. Instead they should be assigning these reporters to fact checking the horrendous health reform and cap and tax bills passed by the House. The media didn't seem to care what influence the Reverend Wright, William Ayres, and other radical associations had on his political philosophy. They still don't seem to care. The media made his fame and so now he is too big to fail in their eyes, so I won't hold my breath.
I know it's hard to believe, but the 2010 elections are going to be a referendum on whether our country will continue to be based on a free market capitalist system or a Marxist/Socialist regime, that is, if it's not too late by the time we get there.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Open Letter on Health Care to Selected Senators/Representatives
am fully against any further intrusion of government into our health
care system. Government meddling is slowly ruining our health care
system and health care will deteriorate further if government
expansion is allowed through a public plan or other requirements
and/or restrictions. Government programs like Medicare and
Medicaid have been one of the primary reasons why health care costs
have increased in the past 40 plus years by passing much of the
provider costs to the private sector and depriving health care
providers with adequate reimbursements. This will only worsen with
any form of a government-funded public option or health “co-op”.
We must also allow health insurers to adequately compete by
reducing the amount of federal and state regulation that discourages
competition across state lines thus giving people more choices. A
combination of increased availability of catastrophic insurance and
health savings accounts along with tax credits is a much better
alternative. Tax credits for U.S. citizens could be used to help
purchase a private plan with further subsidies for those truly in need
economically. This will be a lot cheaper than increasing the federal
intrusion into the industry. Additionally, illegal aliens should NOT be
eligible for government subsidized health care with the exception of
legitimate emergencies. Any emergency health care can be billed to
their home country while they are being safely deported.
More government programs are NOT the answer.
Monday, August 17, 2009
The Example of Medicare
Many Americans want some degree of health care reform. Let's face it, it does have it's flaws, but the flaws aren't totally the fault of the private health insurance industry, nor the health care providers. Rather it is primarily the fault of the very entity that proposes to drastically alter the present system through draconian controls - yes, our government.
Take the Medicare program. It has been around for some 40 plus years and admittedly has increased the availability of health care to the over 65 age group. But at what cost and consequence? Every worker on a payroll pays a Medicare tax and will be automatically eligible at age 65 for Medicare Part A which covers hospital inpatient services only. They will be also eligible for Part B (outpatient and doctor services) for a small premium starting at $96.40/month which goes higher depending on income. The Medicare program tries to contain costs by severely restricting its reimbursements to hospitals, doctors, and other providers. These health care providers then have to make up for their losses by charging higher prices to private insurers and those that self pay. That's why a lot of medical providers are choosing not to participate in Medicare and will not accept patients with Medicare only. Medicaid (health care for the poor) does the same thing and that's why even fewer providers choose to participate. All Medicare (and Medicaid) does is redistribute the higher costs to the private sector and to the public at large.
Even with all the taxes, premiums, and the reduced reimbursements to health care providers, Medicare cannot sustain itself without massive tax increases, increases in premiums, even lower reimbursement rates, further rationing of health care, or raising the eligibility age. So, wouldn't you have to assume that Medicare is a financial failure? This is what would happen if everyone was on a public option government program. If it were accompanied by an eventual government purging of private health insurers because of their inability to compete, the result would be catastrophic leaving citizens to the mercy of the government plan.
Private insurers could not keep operating at a loss without increasing premiums. The government would be able have low premiums and simply cover its losses by increasing taxes and printing and borrowing more money. Many health care providers would not feel it worthwhile to continue providing care with stingy reimbursement rates and, without tort reform, paying huge increases in malpractice fees. Without sufficient providers, the government itself would be forced into running health care facilities with government paid workers. Because of the huge increases in government spending it would then be forced to cut spending on national security and the military, reducing our country's ability to defend itself. Remember Europe really relies on the military power of this country for their defense so they were able to decimate their military to help pay for all its government entitlement programs. This would have catastrophic consequences for the free world allowing totalitarian regimes to spread their ideologies.
So I ask if Medicare is so inefficient, then why do well educated policy makers and politicians continue to want to expand it? You guessed it - it is all about control. Let's hope they don't succeed, and, if they do, we can elect politicians who can reverse the damage in 2010 and 2012. I hope we're not too late.
Thursday, July 16, 2009
The Dumbing of America
Saturday, July 4, 2009
The Left Awakens a Sleeping Giant
Whether or not she becomes one of the final contenders for the 2012 Presidential race is immaterial at this point. Her ability to attract attention wherever she goes will serve as an excellent platform for a consistent conservative message in a time when our country yearns for a voice of reason in the Obama led quest toward a pseudo marxist/socialist republic bent on destroying personal accountability, wealth, and freedom. I am convinced that she will rise to the occasion and that the left will regret that all they have done is awaken a sleeping giant of whom our founding fathers would be most certainly proud.
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
I'm a Right Wing Extremist and Proud of It
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Two Down, About 44 Long Months to Go
I can only hope that the people who voted for this incompetence are having serious second thoughts and will correct their mistakes in the next 22 to 44 months. I wish we didn't have to wait that long and hope that our country survives enough to reverse the damage that is yet to come.